Talk:Bishop of Lichfield

Redundancy
The article Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield contains a listing which is repeated here, formatted differently and without the corrections made in the other article. I propose that Bishop of Lichfield link to the list at Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield list rather than repeating it, but I'd like folks to have a chance to discuss the formatting before I get too bold. --Dystopos 20:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

It would make more sense to make "Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield" link to this list, rather than the other way around, as "Bishop of Lichfield" is both the earliest designation; and also the current designation.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bishop of Lichfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150310010949/http://www.lichfield.anglican.org/ournews/40-years-seem-a-good-stint/ to http://www.lichfield.anglican.org/ournews/40-years-seem-a-good-stint/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151119120045/http://www.lichfield.anglican.org/ourpeople/bishops-and-archdeacons/the-bishop-of-lichfield/ to http://www.lichfield.anglican.org/ourpeople/bishops-and-archdeacons/the-bishop-of-lichfield/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)