Talk:Bishops' saga

Move to 'Bishops' sagas'?
I was wondering if there was a reason the article is named 'saga' and not 'sagas'. Despite visiting the page on and off for years I only just noticed while I was planning a Navbox for it. Are we happy for the article to be moved to Bishops' sagas? C1614 (talk) 11:22, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a good idea to me. Indeed, I'd suggest you could be bold and just make the change :-) Alarichall (talk) 22:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * P.S. I see from the page history that it used to be 'Bishops' sagas' but User:Anders Feder moved it. But other saga-genres on Wikipedia are plural so Anders Feder's decision seems rather idiosyncratic. Alarichall (talk) 22:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. Will get on to it. C1614 (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Tried and was met with this:
 * "The page could not be moved, for the following reason:
 * The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid.
 * Please choose another name, or use Requested moves to ask for the page to be moved.
 * Do not manually move the article by copying and pasting it; the page history must be moved along with the article text."
 * Any thoughts on what to do? C1614 (talk) 10:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It's the plural form that is idiosyncratic, as far as I'm concerned. We don't say a book is a "thrillers", for instance, we say it's a "thriller". The plural form is used about the collection of individual works that constitute the genre, but not about the genre as a concept in and of itself. If you wish to move the article back, I believe you need to request it on one of the noticeboards.--Anders Feder (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)