Talk:Bitcoin/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs) 12:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

This is a very good well written article. Somebody who knows nothing about Bitcoin get get a lot of information from this; technical language is kept to a minimum. However, the only problem I have again is the occasional edit warring. We also seem to get a lot of good faith content that has to be reverted. The criteria specifies that it must be Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. My interpretation of this is that there should be no edit wars in the past month. Verdict: I will put this on hold for ten days. If after that period there has been no edit wars I believe that it deserves GA status. TheMagikCow (talk) 12:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Have you looked at the first GAN? I believe there are still some things that have not been addressed. One such thing is the lack of images from the middle to the bottom of the article. -Newyorkadam (talk) 16:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure quite how you would get images in that section. Images for the sake of images is not good practise... TheMagikCow (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ref #36 is down (redirect to homepage), ref #5 is a 404, ref #22 is down. I honestly still do not believe this article is ready for GA for numerous reasons, but this is not my review... -Newyorkadam (talk) 03:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam

Note: It appears TheMagikCow has passed the article. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 23:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)