Talk:Bitmessage

Suggest to delete criticism section
I think, assertion that it "has so many problems that it probably isn't going to survive" is too strong and undue. Bitmessage is still a new system, and naturally had some bugs. No new vulnerabilities surfaced since the article date Sep 2013. Yurivict (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Article probably needs a re-write
The article is overtly promotional and reads like an infovertisement. Particularly, claims of 'secure encryption' should never be used when a project has never gone through an independent security audit. Some (non-notable) services are also given excessive mention in the article. I've cleaned it up a bit, but the article probably needs further WP:NPOV cleaning. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 11:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Infoboxes
While I think it's good that different implementations are portrayed I think having four infoboxes on a short page like this clutters is quite some bit. I think the infoboxes should be removed and the relevant passages integrated into the corresponding sections of the article. Instead there could be an infobox for just the protocol as there currently is one on the German Wikipedia page. --Evotopid (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Discontinued?
It looks like development of BitMessage has stopped. Last version was in 2016. From https://wiki.bitmessage.org/

It may be wise to just mark the project as discontinued, of which the current page doesn't really establish. Cyali (talk) 23:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)