Talk:Bitmovin

Assessment of article's sources: completely unacceptable
I've reviewed this article's sources. What I've found:
 * This is a personal site, fails WP:RS.
 * This is a product page and so does not establish notability.
 * This is a category for articles, not a specific article. Furthermore, it's a blog that's affiliated with the company.
 * This does mention indeed mention them, but is not in-depth coverage.
 * This doesn't even mention Bitmovin.
 * The following sources are affiliated and so do not establish notability:, , ,
 * The following sources appear to be press releases and so do not establish notability:, , ,
 * The following are lists or directories and do not estalish notability any more than the phonebook does:, ,
 * The following sources do not appear to exist, and given the "quality" of the other sources, I'm not inclined to believe that they're worth digging up on Internet Archive:, , ,

None of the sources support notability. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)