Talk:Biwako

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because sources disproving content have not been presented, rendering the subject data deficient instead of spurious. --108.28.248.212 (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

, The version history of this page shows persistent attempts to circumvent the outcome of Articles for deletion/Mozambican Biwako. Since you participated in that discussion and are thus familiar with the matter, having your eyes on this page would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and apologies for the multiple ping. Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * This is confusing and unusually-persistent hoaxing. GABHello! 00:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, and about 30 seconds from ANI. JohnInDC (talk) 00:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe the page has been deleted; clicking on the article tab brings you to the Lake Biwa article. If it returns, it should be marked as a hoax, and the restorer reported for edit warring and/or vandalism. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

As per [WP:R]], the redirect page for Lake Biwa should be deleted, replacing the header in Lake Biwa with this:

Why the disambiguation? A quick search reveals that Lake Biwa is not the only place you find the term Biwako; an especially notable example being the Biwako Millenium Framework disability rights fund. Add a semi-protect if you prefer. But don't keep this redirect page up when an auto-redirect on the main article and a disambiguation page are more suitable.

Eyes on enough? This is my attempt to reify the matter on both fronts.Kakeithewolf (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I have full protected this redirect for an indefinite period, until such time as consensus emerges about whether this should be a redirect or an article. Leave a note on my talk page when this consensus comes about. Please do not unilaterally circumvent the consensus at Articles for deletion/Mozambican Biwako. If you have a problem with my deletion decision, take it to Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)