Talk:Bizerte Athletic F.C.

Fair use rationale for Image:CA Bizertin.gif
Image:CA Bizertin.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Club Athlétique Bizertin → CA Bizertin – As per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:FOOTY manual of style and consensus, proposing moving to common name of club, as is the norm with all association football clubs. TonyStarks (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant to request it be moved to CA Bizertin not Bizertin. I've changed the previous message, hopefully it will fix it. TonyStarks (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree - RSSSF use the proposed format. Eldumpo (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.