Talk:Black-cowled oriole/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: simongraham (talk · contribs) 02:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

This looks an interesting article. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
The six good article criteria:
 * Well written
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
 * it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout etc.


 * Verifiable
 * it contains a list of all references, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research; and
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.


 * Broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.


 * Neutral
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.


 * Stable
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.


 * Illustrated
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
 * images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Review
This is a really good article. It is clear to read, well referenced and has relevant images. It is stable and 93% authored by one user, MeegsC. A couple of minor suggestions: Great work. I am happy to promote this to WP:GA. simongraham (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Stylistically, the word "primarily" is repeated in consecutive sentences in the lead. I suggest replacing one instance. ✅
 * Link Hugh Strickland in the paragraph after the lead as MOS:DL. ✅
 * Thanks for the review, ! I've made the changes you've suggested. MeegsC (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)