Talk:Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III

comment
why is this "Neo-Assyrian"? - Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 07:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Layard
I know Austen Layard is not the final word on this, but this article needs some citations from modern scholarship on some of the issues presented.Sweetmoose6 (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Significant
"is historically significant because it displays the earliest ancient depiction of an Israelite". Really? Is this the only reason for the most complete Assyrian obelisk to be historically significant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.62.57 (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Humri = Amorite?
This source suggests some scholars disagree with the translation as Omri in favour of Amorites.
 * Reflections on Biblical Histories: A Revised Chronology, Robert N. Palmer, p173

Oncenawhile (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Hoshea?
Someone has changed all the references to Jehu to Hoshea, in this article and in one of the pictures. Can anyone explain? Oncenawhile (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)