Talk:Black cuckoo-dove/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wretchskull (talk · contribs) 16:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

A rather small article. No need to wait long to get a review.


 * Taxonomy and systematics
 * Link subspecies.
 * Done.


 * Vocalizations
 * Is there an audio file of the vocalizations available online? That would definitely be useful.
 * Added xeno-canto link.


 * Behavior and ecology
 * Link subcanopy.
 * Done.


 * General
 * The article is neutral and does not contain any ongoing edit wars or discussions.
 * The lede image is appropriately licensed.
 * Broadness, neutrality and WP:SUMMARY are met.
 * Anything of significance here?
 * No, but I've done a (significant) bit of searching and added some more taxonomy.


 * References
 * No copyvio found
 * Ref 1 and 7 are exactly the same.
 * Merged.


 * Spotchecks:
 * Jobling ref supports all cited text.
 * IOC ref supports all cited text (ref 3a). As for ref 3b, I assume that the fact that there isn't a comment about subspecies means that there are none for that particular species.
 * Avibase ref supports all cited text.
 * The Gibbs et al. book needs pages each time it is cited. Perhaps convert them to shortened footnotes and put the book in a bibliography section. AGF that it supports all cited text.
 * Baptista et al. ref supports all cited text.
 * IUCN ref supports all cited text.
 * Kaszewska et al. ref supports all cited text.

Ping me when you're done. Wretchskull (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I've addressed all your concerns. AryKun (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The article has been promoted to GA. Wretchskull (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)