Talk:Black studies/Archive 1

Question: What part of this article could/should be spun out?
What part of this article could/should be spun out? Daniel Power of God (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm pulling this RfC for several reasons, including: (i) there is no indication that WP:RFCBEFORE has been observed, let alone exhausted; (ii) this is a WP:SPLIT matter, therefore not appropriate for RfC. That is not to say that discussion may not continue: by all means discuss a split proposal, just not as an RfC. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe a third opinion first? Then if it becomes too confusing we can post to the relevant projects or noticeboards (if any). jps (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, jps, I will try third opinion next. Daniel Power of God (talk) 11:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

About the Third Opinion request: The request made at Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made here. Note also that Third Opinion is not a help desk, but a dispute resolution venue. It's not apparent that there is even a dispute here. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 22:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) (Not watching this page)
 * Why not just WP:BEBOLD, Daniel, and spin out? Someone can always revert if they disagree. jps (talk) 01:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * jps, done. Daniel Power of God (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)