Talk:Blackpink/GA1

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article is well written, provides an overview of the topic, and with suitable sources.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 19:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Nominator: 19:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Reviewer: Someone who likes maps (talk · contribs) 06:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * this is not a proper GA review 750h+ 07:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)