Talk:Blackrocks Brewery/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: An anonymous username, not my real name (talk · contribs) 02:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this. Looks promising at a glance. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

It's very good already. The only issues are quite minor:


 * In the lead, the Upper Peninsula of Michigan is linked while the Lower Peninsula of Michigan is not.
 * "424 N. Third Street" should be spelled out in the first use.
 * "Recognition and beer" could probably just be "Recognition".
 * Shouldn't the "Endnotes" section be renamed "References" and the "References" section be renamed "Further reading"? I'm a little confused why it's organized this way.
 * It's up to you, but consider linking — either externally or wikilinking — the sites that provided the sources cited.
 * The Mining Journal is occasionally referenced as just Mining Journal.

Excellent work. I will await your reply. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I only noticed after posting my initial review, but the logo should have a caption, perhaps stating when it was adopted. Placing on hold now. Good luck. An anonymous username, not my real name  02:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delay here! All of these should be addressed except for "recognition and beer". I used that section header because it includes both the ranked coverage of their beer and a short list of their year-round beers. On the logo, as far as I know there's no source that directly says when it was introduced, but it's been in use since the brewery opened. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. It looks like it's in good enough shape now. Congrats! An anonymous username, not my real name  21:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)