Talk:Blacktip reef shark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 22:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC) ~

Hi Yzx, another excellent effort. Other than some minor adjustments I made, I don't see any issues. Have you thought about submitting a shark article for FAC? Sasata (talk) 22:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose is well-written; article complies with MOS.

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
 * Well-referenced to reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Coverage is broad.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images have appropriate free use licenses.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: