Talk:Blackwashing in film

why whitewashing in film page is allowed while blackwashing in film is not? this is racism man!
 * WP:FALSEBALANCE  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * This is racism,it is not a minority point of view,blackwashing if film is a fact,not an opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon barbera (talk • contribs) 19:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Then present some reliable sources for it.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Drive by comment is there any reason this hasn't been at AfD yet? It's mostly unsourced, makes some strong claims which should have equally robust sourcing, and if that was removed, would what's left be worth keeping? I removed some WP:COMPLETEBOLLOCKS about black women not being English, but I think the whole premise of the article needs reevaluating. What do you think, ? &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  09:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * There were more bollocks and I castrated them out. Here is where inserts the old myth of the white Middle Ages (which should be an article!). Send it to AfD: the sourcing is terrible. That Arizona thing is a campus newspaper, and an opinion piece to boot. The Atlanta Black Star is fine but opinionated, and this particular piece is short, very tongue-in-cheek, and not well-written or developed. And 's note on "false balance" is highly valid. Drmies (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion: Make this page a redirect to Color-blind casting
Edit: Nevermind. User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi has already started a discussion at: Articles for deletion/Blackwashing in film
 * Sorry, ! -but I do support that suggestion, as a compromise, although the sourcing will have to be boned up of course. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  15:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)