Talk:Blair House/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I will review this Good Article nominee. Shearonink (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * With my first pass, everything seems to be in fairly-good order but will do some deep reading to make sure this article fulfills the six GA criteria. Shearonink (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

"Other guest facilities" section
I understand that this information is interesting but am not sure it belongs in an article about Blair House/Lee House/etc. Nominator User:LavaBaron, I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 00:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Shearonink, I'm very sorry for my delayed reply. I agree and have removed this section. LavaBaron (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries. Life interferes even with Wikipedia-ing sometimes.  I hope you saved the content - it was fascinating.  I think there might be room for it in one of the diplomacy/protocol articles perhaps?...   Anyway, I will do a deep read and some passes through the article but it is generally looking like if basically fulfills the 6 GA criteria.  I just need to really check & confirm the references.  I hope to get this done within the week or next few days. Shearonink (talk) 01:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

GA Status
I am happy to say that this article in my opinion now fulfills all the categories for a WIkipedia Good Article. It is: Congratulations to all the editors who have worked on this article, especially User: LavaBaron. Shearonink (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Well-written - and interesting to read too!
 * Verifiable with no original research - every reference is valid, and is applicable to the cited information
 * Broad in its coverage - covers the history of all the various buildings plus the staff & protocol issues.
 * Neutral
 * Stable - no edit wars that I am aware of
 * Illustrated by appropriate images - very much so & they seem carefully selected.