Talk:Blair Wark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Passed GA
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Writing is of a high standard (8/10).


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References are all reliable and appropriately positioned.


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Thank you and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)