Talk:Blakely v. Washington

I think it should be a little clearer what Blakely did beyond Apprendi. I will work on that if nobody gets to it before me. Mrees1997 18:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Blakely leading to Booker
Somewhere we ought to include _some_ mention of Booker, no? 14:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm on it, as part of a general revision of this article, so that I can clean up the Booker article as suggested. ---Axios023 23:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Double negative
In the 3rd paragraph of O'Connors decision it says this:

"Bifurcated proceedings may become commonplace in criminal trials, so that a jury might not improperly consider prior bad acts during the guilt phase but properly consider them when it comes time for sentencing."

I think it's meant to say "a jury might improperly consider prior bad acts during the guilt phase". No? Stephlet 08:04, 22 April 2014 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephlet (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Blakely v. Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923115559/http://www.ussc.gov/STATES/blakely.htm to http://www.ussc.gov/STATES/blakely.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)