Talk:Blanche on the Lam

Refrences
Hello Blanche on the Lam(ians)! Here is what i found by Scouring LiOn to help get you started: http://0-gateway.proquest.com.opac.sfsu.edu/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2003&xri:pqil:res_ver=0.2&res_id=xri:lion-us&rft_id=xri:lion:rec:mla:R04174357 This looks to be a paper about the book by a Mildred Mickle

http://0-gateway.proquest.com.opac.sfsu.edu/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2003&xri:pqil:res_ver=0.2&res_id=xri:lion-us&rft_id=xri:lion:ft:mla:R03592737:0 another paper by Rosemary Hathaway

you may want to search for "Why Standdpoint Matters" by Alison Wylie. The only way it is available through lion is through Link+ which may take a moment

I also recommend JStor and Project Muse for sources! Good Luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JHSlavin (talk • contribs) 20:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help!--Serena530 (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Don't add empty sections
Per best practice, please don't add empty sections. For further information, please consult: Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Formatting and Illustrating Articles/Article Sections and Tables of Contents.

I've placed a backup copy complete with empty sections in User:Sarahdaly44/Blanche on the Lam. It is acceptable to add material that is under construction in your user space. Viriditas (talk) 04:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Suggestions
Article is looking good. You need to clean up the introductory section - - Wikipedia has a good set of guidelines to writing lead sections. I think you could/should compress the plot summary. The Themes section also needs some work: I'd suggest changing title of first section to simply - - "Invisibility"; that first section needs some references added; the second section looks like a cut and paste of a couple of articles - - summarize and paraphrase to make a smooth paragraph/section. References for last item in Critical Reception. Profhanley (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)