Talk:Bleach (manga)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 02:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I will review this article. DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 02:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

DragonZero ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 04:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Some places are missing citations, most notably the anime section. Some are missing webcite templates. An archive should use the archive webcite template. The Bleach TCG website's domain is for sale.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit wars, only casual vandalism
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1 image, proper rationale
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Citations are an issue. As of right now, it is not qualified for GA.
 * Comments
 * Ref 2 is dead.
 * Ref 13 is dead.
 * Ref 21 should link to actual article.
 * Ref 24 and 25. Article says it released 22 DVDs, the citation leads up to 20.
 * Ref 51 missing cite web template.
 * Ref 54, suggested to use archive web template.
 * Ref 56, the ref does not say who played who.
 * Ref 61 dead.
 * Citations needed in anime section.
 * Ref 56, the ref does not say who played who.
 * Ref 61 dead.
 * Citations needed in anime section.

about the dead references, 10 min on waybackmachine would fix it right? 88.91.182.227 (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)