Talk:Bleeding Cool

Tone
This page reads like it was written by the owner of the website in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.151.247 (talk • contribs) 08:44, May 8, 2019 (UTC)

Inaccurate Claims
The sentence "Bleeding Cool has a reputation within the industry for breaking news and bringing to light previously unreported scandal" is blatantly untrue. Bleeding Cool's reputation is for poor writing, worse editing and a lack of focus on shows readers actually watch. Under its current leadership, it's become the laughing stock of the geek world--a British AICN. Most of its writers can't string a sentence together, and few of them have any grasp of basic grammar or punctuation. The site's reputation isn't for breaking news--it's for being broken.
 * There are two citations supporting that statement. If you think we should include additional information about other aspects of its reputation, we need cited reliable sources for it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)