Talk:Bliki

I removed
from the list. That's a CMS/Groupware, among the last choices if you want to get a bliki (no history control for blogs, by example). It does feature blogs, a Wiki, and would allow to have a very basic Bliki.--Chealer 06:36, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
 * Tiki, a PHP and MySQL-based content management system with features such as a wiki engine, blogs, forums, image galleries, polls, etc.

do you know what is the language of this site香港旅游?

Yes, I do. It seems to be Chinese, whichever dialect originates in Hong Kong (that's probably what the HK stands for. --Htmlism 05:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Vanilla related edit
Hi i think it should say wiki with weblog support (its stated the other way around currently) at least for vanilla. Also [] is not christian langreiters personal page and you can get vanilla from there for free, so i moved the link to 'free and open soruce bliki engines'

a cross between caveat emptor and disambiguation
I happen to be in the market for community software for my site and so have learned, or been reminded, that marketers will say anything to make a sale. I still think words should have clear and, if possible, unique meanings. So this is something of a disambiguation. Natcolley 05:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Links
There are way too many links. In case you missed that the first time, there are way too many links, most of them not needed. If you are familiar with this topic, please go through and remove the ones which are not necessary. Thanks! Isopropyl 04:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Links again
I reorganized the links. I especially focused on the commerical links, deleting all of the superulous advertising.

I deleted the following:


 * System One Launched 2005, co-developed by Chris Langreiter (see Vanilla above)


 * also deleted: extends Wikilogs with semistructured elements and just-in-time information retrieval. on a Semantic Web backend and targeted for larger enterprise usage.

this is technobabel to the avergage person. The webpage is just as bad. I see no bliki on this page, although the page is set up so badly, I may be missing it.

Please rewrite it for "the rest of us", and add a link to the bliki page, or leave it out of the page.

Hopefully this solves Isopropyl complaint, which I never saw until after my edits. This says that two people indepdently saw a big problem with the links on this page.Travb 20:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

History in blikis?
History seems to work differently in blikis, compared to, say, MediaWiki, and in some cases it's hard to find. This can be confusing to the newbie (i.e. me) who's used to MediaWiki. (The article mention that IkiWiki doesn't store hisory, but says nothing else.) Could we have a sentence or paragraph explaining how it works, or linking to an explanation? Thanks --Singkong2005 talk 00:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Neologism
I'd never heard of this term until it was linked to from another article. Is this a notable term? Isn't this whole article worthy of little more than a footnote on the blog and wiki articles? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone claims he has invented wiki-like comments. Big deal. "Inventor", get an idea. I vote for deletion --Paxcoder (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

MediaWiki
If MediaWiki requires an extension in order to support blikis, then can it really be considered to have bliki support? MediaWiki can do a lot of things with the right extensions; that doesn't mean it actually supports all that stuff. Reach Out to the Truth 03:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

According to definition, DokuWiki does not qualify.
According to the part of the bliki definition which says "editing is done in wiki style, with [...] special markup tags", DokuWiki isn't a bliki. DokuWiki uses a WYSIWYG editor to produce normal X/HTML markup tags. There are no special tags.

So, what's correct? The definition, or, the presence of DokuWiki here? --76.102.243.117 (talk) 15:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)