Talk:Block suballocation

Old discussion
Merging tail-packing & Block suballocation looks like a good idea to me. Go for it. Alan 05:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

It seems to me that the criticism section is both on the wrong page (belongs as part of the reiser article) and also completely false, at least from what I read. For a good deal of time Reiser had the best performance of anything out there, and much of that was due to the tail packing.

Since I'm not that sure; I just flagged it cn, if someone else wants to do more it would be a good idea —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.176.113 (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The criticisms section is pretty awful as-is. The statement is specific to ReiserFS, it's unclear as to whether it applies to just that file system or any with tail packing, it's completely unsourced, and it's been marked with multiple 'cn' and related markers for ages. I'm deleting it. EvanED (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Block suballocation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061113155043/http://www.namesys.com/disk_usage.html to http://www.namesys.com/disk_usage.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061113154730/http://www.namesys.com/X0reiserfs.html to http://www.namesys.com/X0reiserfs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)