Talk:BlooP and FlooP

Sufficient notability to remove the flag
= Sufficient notability =

Floop and Bloop are notable enough for me. In other words: I referenced this article, coming from Recursion. I'm going to remove the tag. It's still a stub, perhaps, but the links help etc etc. Bill Wvbailey (talk) 23:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Ooops, it looks like a similar action on my part got delayed. Derek farn (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

GlooP
I think this page should probably talk about GlooP, given that GlooP is practically the entire reason these two languages were in the book, AFAICT.

Even though GlooP isn't very well-defined, some stuff could still be discussed about it.

Blitzer99 (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Agreed!