Talk:Blood-C: The Last Dark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 08:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Despite the minor issues raised above, this article had far less issues coming into GAN than the original series' article. There is adequate information on the film's Japanese release, in addition to releases in other countries. Overall, the article gives a comprehensive overview of the film, given the sources. This is an easy pass. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Again, there's the problem of capitalizing "mangaka" as "Mangaka", but this doesn't affect the overall quality of the article; it's up to you if you want to change the capitalization or not. Nana Mizuki again should be wikilinked on the first mention in the Production section.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: