Talk:Blood (OSI album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  C  anniba loki  21:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Checklist
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * What makes madeloud.com, metalstorm.net, rocknworld.com/thrashpit, and ultimate-guitar.com reliable sources? A person writing things like "nu metal bullshit" make it sound non-professional to me.
 * The works of MadeLoud writer Andrew Reilly "has appeared in The A.V. Club, RedEye, and Ghost Factory, among others [...]". In contrast, Matt Hensch proved to be a non-professional writer in his profile for Encyclopaedia Metallum.--  C  anniba loki  14:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I always interpreted Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs) to mean that a review is reliable if it's written by a professional writer,  or  features on a reliable site per WP:RS (or both). Am I misinterpreting? Una LagunaTalk 14:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Both.--  C  anniba loki  14:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm - if both were required wouldn't "and" have been used over "or"? I don't like being pedantic, but I'm slightly surprised by this because I used similar sources for my last two WP:ALBUM GANs and they checked out fine. Una LagunaTalk 16:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * On hold for a week.--  C  anniba loki  22:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed.--  C  anniba loki  21:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your thorough review! Una LagunaTalk 11:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * On hold for a week.--  C  anniba loki  22:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed.--  C  anniba loki  21:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your thorough review! Una LagunaTalk 11:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed.--  C  anniba loki  21:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your thorough review! Una LagunaTalk 11:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * Mike Portnoy of Dream Theater, who performed drums on the first two albums, was replaced by Porcupine Tree drummer Gavin Harrison on Blood. What albums?
 * Clarified. ✅ Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Matheos and Moore worked together on the album long-distance, mainly by emailing each other files. What kind of files? Audio file format?
 * They never specify in the interviews I've cited. They only ever talk about exchanging "files", so I think that's all we can do in the article. Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Harrison had a schedule gap over summer 2008, so agreed to work on the album. Reword "summer" per WP:SEASON.
 * Makes sense... I'm not 100% familiar with the quarter system though - do correct me if summer in the northern hemisphere doesn't correspond to the fourth quarter! Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

--  C  anniba loki  21:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅--  C  anniba loki  22:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review the article! I attempted to find reviews from sites that complied with WP:ALBUMS. On a second look, I think the Ultimate Guitar review doesn't count as reliable (it seems to be submitted by a user rather than a staff member), so I'll remove it and any references to it. The other sources seem to pass WP:ALBUMS in that they have editorial and writing staff. The "nu metal bullshit" quote isn't particularly enlightening to the reader; given that there's a more articulated quote from the same reviewer immediately after it, I could probably remove it. Otherwise I don't see any problems, but if I'm misinterpreting the guidelines, do say.

I've noticed you have put a "neutral" by criterion 6B but haven't made any specific comments? Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)