Talk:Blood Libels

Requested Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED due to no support below Tiggerjay (talk) 07:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Blood Libels → Blood Libels (album) – There is an article concerning 'blood libel', and 'Blood libels' redirects there. In keeping with WP:NAME, this article should be moved and the current article name should redirect to blood libel. 174.51.31.120 (talk) 17:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose "Libel" isn't a word that's really used in plural form, as far as I know. It's more likely you'd say "cases of libel," "instances of libel," etc. Given that, I'm comfortable with the status quo, except that I'd rather see Blood libels redirect here. --BDD (talk) 20:58, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No opposition. I can understand the IP user’s point but would accept whatever decision you guys (or ladies, for those who are and don’t want to be called “guys”) end up with. --217 /83 23:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Both the capitalization and the plural make the title distinct enough for disambiguation purposes.Cúchullain t/ c 18:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose. "blood libels" is used frequently in the plural since there were reoccuring blood libels throughout the middle ages, however guideline (somewhere) states that per Red Meat / red meat, capitalization is sufficient. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)