Talk:Bloody Christmas (1920)

Argument against merge.
There is no need for a merge. (At least, not with the Italian Regency of Carnaro). I have recently created articles within the scope of the subject of the Free State of Fiume, and will continue to do so. Amongst these is the Rijeka campaign, of which the Bloody Christmas is part of. I will soon be creating a wide ranging article on the Rijeka campaign of the Free State of Fiume against the Kingdom of Italy before its turn towards fascism. If a merge was to occur, it would be better suited for these soon to created articles rather than the Regency of Carnaro. The Impresa di Fiume is just one small piece of a long series on the lead up to the Bloody Christmas and for now, at least, I feel the article is better suited as it is. Unfortunately due to my job my time here is somewhat limited, but I shall get around to creating a wider scope of Rijeka articles in the coming week or so.--D Namtar 22:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The way it stands, the Regency article is the general D'Annunzio campaign article, so if you want you can move that article to a such a title -- Fiume campaign? -- and then the other titles can be incoming redirects pointing to individual sections. (I had already merged Impresa di Fiume into the regency article with exactly such an intent - composing two stubs into a better article with more context.) --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I may do so, as the Regency article doesn't cover the full broad ranging events. Whilst the Impresa di Fiume may have been merged, with upcoming articles (probably this weekend), the topic may be too broad to be considered for a merge into only one article, but rather I may create these further articles, as part of a series that links into seperate events, and edit the Regency to give a general view rather than the main hub for the topic. Thank you for your feedback.--D Namtar 10:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)