Talk:Bloody Fun Day/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Initial Comment
I'm going to be looking at the article, feel free to message me with any concerns. :) Canadian   Nine  00:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Well-written, hard to decide on verifiable sources because it is a flash game, but I decided they were acceptable.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Again, non-blog sources are difficult, but I'll pass it because it's a flash game.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'd just like to remind you that blogs are not normally acceptable as sources, but because it's Flash, I'll accept them. Congratulations!
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'd just like to remind you that blogs are not normally acceptable as sources, but because it's Flash, I'll accept them. Congratulations!
 * I'd just like to remind you that blogs are not normally acceptable as sources, but because it's Flash, I'll accept them. Congratulations!