Talk:BlueforSudan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Frzzl (talk · contribs) 14:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Review
Hello there, I'm Frzzl, and I'm going to review your article. 14:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * This article unfortunately has a lot of MOS problems, some examples below: • far too many short paragraphs, which make it harder to read

• prose isn't that well written

• large sections need wikilinking
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Sources on the whole seem reliable, but I need to say that the refs really aren't well formatted - no author, no tagging for the multiple YT videos used as sources. Also a fair few sentences were directly lifted from the university website.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This is the big one - this article (understandably as you seem to quite connected to Sudan) has major POV issues, and large parts of it honestly need to be rewritten. See examples below.
 * while obviously this is a terrible incident, the article has a REALLY strong pro-protest tone and POV, which is why it can't be a GA•
 * while obviously this is a terrible incident, the article has a REALLY strong pro-protest tone and POV, which is why it can't be a GA•

•

•
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * couldn't find any wars, reverts - seems stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are OK, the shade of blue probably needs a source tho
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * quickfail due to the multiple issues, (especially the POV) which fail WP:GAC