Talk:Bluey (2018 TV series)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Allied45 (talk · contribs) 11:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Lead

 * Link first mention of Brisbane

Notable guest stars

 * I feel that all entries in this list should include citations if they are being deemed as "notable"
 * Myf Warhurst also appears in the recurring list for a different character; this would not make her a "guest star"

Development

 * Include (ABC) and (BBC) after first mentions of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the British Broadcasting Corporation
 * "and Sam Moor describing it as "[Brumm's] life on screen" – and producer Sam Moor describing it as "[Brumm's] life on screen
 * Link South Brisbane

Reception

 * I would suggest deleting the Ratings table as there is no real value added; the air dates are covered in the Episodes section, and the ratings figures are only for select episodes. Additionally, the average viewers figures are unsourced.

Overall comments
This is the first time I have completed a GA review and I am really impressed with this article (it's great to see good quality Australian content!). I only have minor concerns regarding the lack of citations for some portions of the content, that could be perceived as original research. Article is on hold awaiting resolution of these minor points. – Allied45 (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for the review, I appreciate the feedback. I love working on Australian content. I have addressed all of the issues listed above - for the guest stars, I have removed those names without available citations. In creating the article, I have managed to archive some of the citations, and I will make an effort to ensure all links are saved - thanks for the suggestion. In regards to any further lack of citations, would you be able to point out areas which need to be improved? Thanks again. SatDis (talk) 04:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


 * , it was just the notable guest stars and the ratings table I was referring to regards to citations. Since everything I raised is now addressed, I am happy to pass this nomination. Thanks for beginning to archive the citations, I will try and help with this if I get a chance :) – Allied45 (talk) 08:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review!! SatDis (talk) 09:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)