Talk:Blumont

I have suggested taking out the redirect of this page to International Relief and Development (IRD) and adding information on the organization, as it is a new company under new leadership that is distinct from IRD. While Blumont builds on IRD's work, it focuses on different areas of international development and implements in different places/countries. It may be more accurate to redirect the IRD page to the Blumont page, as IRD is the out-of-date name for Blumont, but there is relevant information to IRD that is also not applicable to Blumont. There has also been an attempt to put information about Blumont on the IRD page, which has consistently been changed to reflect outdated information relevant only to IRD. Therefore, I maintain that Blumont should have its own page.User78953 (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)User78953
 * There's several reasons a standalone Blumont page is a bad idea. Nearly all of the sources about Blumont are self-reported, none of which are reliable. As Blumont, the organization on its own has little to no notability as its own organization, and definitely not enough notability to merit its own page. There's nothing lost by combining it with IRD, which satisfies notability and has adequate RS. Bangabandhu (talk) 02:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)