Talk:Bob's Burgers/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kww (talk · contribs) 23:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Lead section
Fails to summarize article.
 * 1) April 7, 2011 data only in lead, not contained in article.
 * 2) "Human Flesh" viewership only in lead, not contained in article.
 * 3) Mention of "59th" place violates WP:NUMERO, not mentioned in article, and contains an irrelevant comparison to other series.

Plot
This section says very little about the plot.

Original pilot
One massive mispunctuated run-on sentence.

Executive Producers
Another mispunctuated run-on sentence.

Writing
Unsourced.

Setting
Unsourced.

Themes
Probably beyond obvious. I'd say "unsourced", but my real objection is that if this is all that can be said, there's no use saying anything.

Home media
Run-on sentence.

Success
Hopelessly biased. It says that most reviews were mixed, and then proceeds to list only positive comments.

Awards and nominations
Another WP:NUMERO violation.

Criticism and controversy
No controversy to be found here, but it does seem to have all the negative parts of those mixed reviews. Fold it together with "Success", and call it "Reception".

International broadcast
Kill the flags, per MOS:ICON.

Merchandise
Another massive run-on sentence.

The following sections have been fixed:


 * International broadcast, the flags have been removed
 * Original pilot, the section is no longer a run-on sentence


 * Comment - This article is no where near where it needs to be for a GA. Most of the references are bare links to sites and a good chunk of the prose is completely unsourced. Consider this was a former GA that got demoted, this needs a bit of work to pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Failing; still unsourced sections after a month. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 12:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)