Talk:Bob Cranmer

AfSD
I flagged this because the article nevers shows the notability of the subject. I did some searching on Mr. Cranmer and only found that he was the former County Commissioner of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania which doesn't make him notable under WP:POLITICIAN (falls under second-level sub-national when first-level sub-national is the cut off). Ol Yeller '''Talktome 06:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but this person passes A7 per the assertions of notability in the article. He has been a "County Commissioner of Allegheny County". Though this fails WP:POLITICIAN, this information is enough to pass A7. Since I do not want to edit war, I've placed a hangon tag on the article and ask the reviewing administrator to add a prod tag to this article since I agree with OldYeller that this person is non-notable. Cunard (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see how he falls under A7 and you haven't given any proof that he has. I'm fine with waiting though.  Edit wars = bad. Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 09:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This part of the article: shows that this individual passes A7. I doubt that this split was "famous" enough to confer notability, but I believe that that is enough information to pass A7. I have no objections to a prod tag or an AfD, though. I am contesting this speedy deletion because someone might be able to rescue this article by looking at these sources on Google News Archive. Cunard (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. You're right that it could be considered a notable event that he was involved in.  I personally don't think it is but that would at least move if from AfSD to AfD.  I'll remove the AfSD tag (and the hangon assuming you have no objections). Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 10:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You mind checking out those other tags to see if you agree with those? Ol Yeller '''Talktome 10:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

COI tag
There is no need for both a COI tag and an autobiography tag; they mean the same thing in this context. Putting both there is simply punitive and doesn't help editors in figuring out page issues. (Same goes for the redundant "citations missing" and "unreferenced" tags.) THF (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. I guess I assumed that the template I used would only have each issues once.  When I read "unreferenced" I assumed it used the template that says that it didn't have any references not that it didn't have any references and didn't have any inline citations.  As for the COI and autobiography tag.  I didn't catch that I left both in.  My mistakes.  I'll be more careful in the future.  Thanks for the help. Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 18:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Is the photography section noteworthy? Ol Yeller '''Talktome 15:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I see now that it's referenced with a story by the 2 largest newspapers in Pitt. Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 15:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 09:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)