Talk:Bob Flowerdew

Untitled
Data on Family Members (of living persons, not historical ones)

I don't know... I always feel sort of uncomfortable to see Wikipedia articles on contemporary people, in which (for no good reason, as I see it), data on their relatives is revealed. I think we should be much more restrictive in that point, no matter if we find some particular piece of information potentially "too much" or not, but simply out of principle.

I don't even see why we need to know that someone like Bob Flowerdew (and he serves me only as an example) is married, or why it should matter to us wether he has any children or not. But I particularly don't see why their names have to be posted all over the www. Why can't the article say: "where he lives with his wife and their twins" instead of "where he lives with his wife, Vonetta, a care worker, and their twins, Italia and Malachi."

I personally would object to having my name posted all over the www, just because my father happens to be a minor celebrity. I don't know how old Bob's children are; but as I said, he only serves me as an example - and I think that particularly in cases where the children are too young to ask themselves the question whether they would object, and too young to take a decision on that matter, and too young to do anything about it themselves, it would seem appropriate not to publish any unnecessary information, on principle. ((This, for me, is the equivalent of tabloids printing photographs of the children of VIPs, which I think should be made illegal entirely.))

I was wondering whether Wikipedia had any policy on that matter? Otto von B. (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)