Talk:Bobath concept

Translation details

 * Article: de:Bobath-Konzept
 * Corresponding English-language article: Bobath concept
 * Worth doing because: No English-language article.
 * Originally Requested by: Roland2 15:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Status: Translated from article on de. Website noted below added as ext link.  SteveW | Talk 21:05, 4 May 2005 (UTC).
 * Other notes: a cited definition + some external links + crossreferences are available; from http://www.bobath-instruktorinnen.de/2_1_theorie.php: "Dr. Karel Bobath, ein Arzt, und Berta Bobath, Gymnastiklehrerin, später Zusatzausbildung zur Physiotherapeutin, wurden beide Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts in Berlin geboren und emigierten während des 2. Weltkrieges nach England."

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bobath concept. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041211200710/http://www.bobath-instruktorinnen.de:80/2_1_theorie.php to http://www.bobath-instruktorinnen.de/2_1_theorie.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Evidence of effectiveness
Cheers fellow wikipedians !

I decided to delete part of evidence description which says "there are no evidence for non-effectiveness". It's obsolete, next to information, that "there are no evidence for effectiveness". In scientific method you cannot prove non-existence, therefore only statements about proofs for existence or lack of evidence for existence are sensible. Statements like "there is no evidence for absence of" can mislead the public- they suggest that there is something missing in research.

I'm eager to discuss and work on improvement of this part :)

Peace and science to all Very large shadow (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Article is biased
While I embrace that appropriate criticism is included in this article, the overall tone of this article is biased towards dismissing the Bobath work. Besides being unencyclopedic it does not reflect the context and historical development of this work and it's place in terms of introducing Developmental Concepts into Physio- and occupational therapy.

I intend to do some work to rebalance this to a more encyclopaedic tone.SebastianBechinger (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)