Talk:Bodo (deacon)

Untitled
Why is this reference to the missing articles project here? JFW | T@lk  02:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC) '
 * I thought we are supposed to put that on the articles? If not, please feel free to remove it. Joaquin Murietta 04:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I found it here

'Once you have created an article/redirect, leave an edit summary pointing to this project. This is important as it tells reviewers why the article/redirect was made and gains this project some visibility. Suggested edit summary: Created as part of the WikiProject Missing articles', but... did I misread this? Is it limited to redirects? Joaquin Murietta 04:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * DUH !! "Suggested edit summary: Created as part of the WikiProject Missing articles". Hint, the edit summary is not the same as the article body. --81.77.140.39 06:57, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I think it is a noble endeavour to make mention of that important Wikiproject. Perhaps it should go both in the edit summary and on the talk page. JFW | T@lk  08:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks JFD, I'll remove it from the article and keep it on the talk page. Joaquin Murietta 13:10, 23 October 2005 (UTC) Oops! Someone did it. Thank you.

Birthdate discrepancy
The lead paragraph says that he was born c. 814; the birth category says 823; any way to tell which is correct; I assume the sources cited may be the source of the conflicting birthdates? --FeanorStar7 15:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Clerical discrepancy
Bodo can not be refered as a Bishop if he was a deacon. Deacons are but lowest rank clerics within Christianity-Catholicism, and bishops the highest (regular Priest in between). Hence, the problem with the title of this article. He may have been a deacon, but being ONLY such, certainly do does not make him a bishop by any definition. Some clarification should be made, as he may have gone up the religious ranks and eventually become a bishop within the episcopate before he converted to Judiadism.Micael (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)