Talk:Bodo Linnhoff

Privacy of personal information and using primary sources
I don't want to start a war, but the sentence I deleted includes their (alleged) address. This contravenes our Privacy of personal information and using primary sources which states that, "articles should not include postal addresses, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, or other contact information for living persons..." Please also note the next paragraph which mentions people "who are not generally well known. In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability... and there is additional protection for subjects who are not public figures." as is the case here.

The next paragraph mentions the "Privacy of Names" which says, "Consider whether the inclusion of names of private living individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons."

Many thanks for your kind consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.91.139 (talk) 00:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Naming the country is hardly an address as defined. Giving the name of the spouse is usual.Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Unsupported statements
Wikipedia relies on verifiable sources. I know that some of this stuff has come from the great man himself, but this is not how the system works.Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Still a lot of unreferenced statements. Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Still unreferenced statements.Chemical Engineer (talk)