Talk:Bokaro Steel City/Archive 1

Untitled
Places of interest : Please dont add things like Information added by and use external links. From the history tab, we can know who added what information. Sandyiit 11:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
WP India with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate, please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 10:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Its a valid change and the change has been restored. Sandyiit (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup
Please suggest ways to clean up the page and make it better and more informative? Ideas invited. Sandyiit (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

CISF conflict at Bokaro
Please use CISF conflict at Bokaro to tell more about the conflict and not the main Bokaro Page. --Sandyiit (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Colony
I think it's important to explain that Bokaro Steel City is just a big colony to house industrial workers. Unlike Ranchi and Jamshedpur, it doesn't have basic characteristics of a city till date. It's still not connected with the local economy and population. The economy is solely dependent on Bokaro Steel Plant. The city can't exist without Bokaro Steel Plant. The rest of business, basically all shops, are for convenience of the town's residents. In absence of colleges and universities, Bokaro can't be called a educational center. The town has many primary and secondary schools, which exists to give basic training to kids to join elite training institutes in the rest of the country and become cheap labour to run industrial houses there. Bokaro Steel City takes pride in it. Manoj nav (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)




 * Bokaro Steel City is a city per Government of India stipulations and the city is well recognized as a center of education. The city produced students who are today working at some of the top organizations in "highly" paid jobs. Don't push POVs and assumptions. Wikipedia is not the place for that. You may consider writing a Blog for the purpose.


 * Happy Blogging!
 * Regards,
 * --Indian (talk) 02:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup
There current tone of the article is not appropriate. Information should be presented in an objective manner (see WP:NPOV), instead of using colorful language to emphasise the qualities of the subject. Note that I'm not disputing the accuracy of the statements, but rather the wording and the expression -Reconsider the static (talk) 04:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There are many sections of this article that lack references. Perhaps the content is referenced by some of the external links, but this article needs better footnoting; as it stands much of the content seems to be original research. PDCook (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)