Talk:Bold Orion/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. weapins. Change to weapons.

2. USAF's. Suggest - Changing USAF to United States Air Force, as some people might not understand that acronym
 * I added a clarification of the acronym after where the full name is given on the line above.

3. change the Bibliography so that it is in alphabetical order.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! - The Bushranger One ping only 01:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

That was fast! Nice work Bush, Passed. Thurgate (talk) 01:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)