Talk:Bolek and Lolek

Untitled
Article needs a picture of Bolek and Lolek. Dr. Dan 13:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Article could also be quite easily extended by translating available info from, --Gf1961 10:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

were created by native German Alfred Ledwig, and became occupated by Władysław Nehrebecki, and Leszek Mech.
Any sources? Xx236 06:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC) German page on juristic problems]: first paragraph mentions Ledwig being the creator of Bolek and Leszek Lorek being the creator of Lolek, both sharing a prize in a competition, Lorek later selling his rights to Ledwig. I cannot read:, which also maybe of help. Best regards, German I am (remember Wawrzyniec Gucewicz ?), but honestly without inclination towards Germanizing Lolek and Bolek; :->; no contribution besides note on Discussion page so far. --Gf1961 12:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

-- I give a picture of Bolek and Lolek. Please, about correct placing picture! Thank Piksel169 (Poland)

Iranian television
Some comments about the line with Iranian television: The revolution took place in 1979. As a native Iranian, I watched a lot of Bolek & Lolek as a kid but I remember that there were some other cartoons as well. The variety was small but I there were lot of Japanese cartoons when I grew up in the end of 70's. / Hamid

Proposed merge
I propose that Bolek and Lolek lawsuit be merged into Bolek and Lolek. I do not believe that the former article has enough notability to be its own article, but it would be a good addition of inforamtion to the already short Bolek and Lolek article. ~ Lhynard (talk) 16:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed, Merge Klbrain (talk) 21:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

United States ? Paramount ?
Is this serious? The United States coproduced the series? during the Cold War? Kintaro (talk) 21:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

NPOV dispute
The Siegessaeule section of the article, asides from being written in terrible English, is very clearly written with a lot of bias. I would propose to remove it entirely, as it does not seem to be relevant to the rest of the article, but it could simply be re-written without the homophobia and dubiously sourced content. Acolossus &#124; Talk &#124; Contributions 21:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Fantastic, this is an even better fix. Acolossus &#124; Talk &#124; Contributions 12:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Could the disputes be added
But this time around. This should not have the homophobia & dubiously sourced content & use sources that are accurate (Darn how the f i spell that word) Zuper-kun (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)