Talk:Boletopsis nothofagi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Seppi333 (talk · contribs) 02:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Discussion
I have a quick question about the citation convention used; I'm assuming this is the case, but do the citations at the end of each paragraph cover all the content in the paragraph?  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 02:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Seppi, thanks for taking on this review. Yes, the end-of-paragraph citations use fairly broad page ranges and cover all the material in the paragraph. I could have made them a bit tighter and more frequent, but don't strictly think it necessary in this case as it should be pretty easy for the reader to verify info from the paper. Sasata (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * In the lead, would you be willing clarify what the term hymenophore means using parentheses or comma separation? As a mycology layman, I had no clue what that was without looking it up, but everything else I understood.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 18:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. Sasata (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Also, I just made a minor cosmetic change with the placement of 1 image.  Please feel free to revert it to the previous state if there's any problems that my edit may have caused.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 06:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Result
Thanks kindly for your helpful review Seppi. I've removed "is considered" from the text per your suggestions. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 07:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)