Talk:Boletus aereus

Article Is A Bit Confusing
The article is a bit confusing because it jumps between the aereus and reginus latin names. It should describe in the beginning which is the right name and why and then stick to the right name throught out the rest of the article.174.6.130.25 (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)BeeCier
 * Yep, fixing that. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

On the way to GA....
This article is looking in fair shape. Only problem is I can't find anything online to explain how B. mamorensis is different to B. aereus. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Added a bit. Hold on for a bit with the GA nom and I'll go through it with a fine-tooth comb (I still have a bit of material to add too). Sasata (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok cool. It just sorta came together naturally (with some help) so felt may as well get it to a stable point....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I can't find the fulltext of Maire (1937) either :( Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * This one? Sasata (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Got it. Sasata (talk) 07:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * thx +++ - that ref has a few other species listed that it might be good to add on for North African range. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

you added everything you can think of now? cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm more confident it's within GA range now. I'll probably have more to add before FAC. Sasata (talk) 07:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi guys, the reference to B. aereus occurring in China is erroneous. This is clearly pre-dating recent molecular work and has been revised by Dentinger et al. who showed B. aereus to have a strictly European-North African distribution.

Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.251.118.251 (talk) 11:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Aaah good point. Question is...what is the Chinese taxon then? And how far east is ''B. aereus actually found.....(sigh) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Boletus edulis is the only Boletus sensu stricto with a widespread holarctic distribution. Acc. to Dentinger B. aereus is restricted to Europe (mostly the Med) and North Africa. It may be present in Israel, i'll check for references. The Chinese porcini are still undescribed as far as i know... but my guess is not for long.

Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.251.118.251 (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boletus aereus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130523094609/http://static.msi.umn.edu/rreports/2010/211.pdf to http://static.msi.umn.edu/rreports/2010/211.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Black fungus
From the article: "It is commonly known as ontto beltza (black fungus) in Basque"; from my research it appears the spelling should be "onddo beltza". Could the original source be checked to confirm if this is the intended spelling? Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)