Talk:Boletus rubroflammeus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 11:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

rev  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  11:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Necesita epithet. ;)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  10:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Done! Sasata (talk) 10:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Boletus rubroflammeus passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As always, thanks for the review, it's much appreicated! Sasata (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As always, thanks for the review, it's much appreicated! Sasata (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * As always, thanks for the review, it's much appreicated! Sasata (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * As always, thanks for the review, it's much appreicated! Sasata (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)