Talk:Bomba, the Jungle Boy

Fact Vs. opinion?
I often find myself turning to Wikipedia these days quite regularly to seek reference and knowledge towards any given subject matter, as do most people. My belief was that Wikipedia is a convergence of information substantially based upon fact(s)? As I began reading the articles assembled and published on “ BOMBA, the jungle boy” the purported references and information gathered left me rather confounded. The aforementioned;

“A common theme of the Bomba books is that Bomba, because he is white, has a soul that is awake, while his friends, the dark-skinned natives, have souls that are sleeping. Richard A. Lupoff, in his book Master of Adventure, a study of the works of Tarzan creator Edgar Rice Burroughs, describes the Bomba tales as more blatantly racist than the often-criticized Tarzan books.”

Much like Mr. Lupoff I too have an opinion. However I feel his discernments in regards to fact and reference in this article is entirely irrelevant, and should be acknowledged as such, his opinion. I find it completely irresponsible for Wikipedia to allow such opinion based statements to be part of an excerpt that is meant to inform not reform? Jasen2525 (talk) 18:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)