Talk:Bombardier CRJ700 series/Archive 2

Infobox Image change
We should this image: File:Bombardier CRJ-900LR Lufthansa Cityline (LCL) D-ACKG - MSN 15084 - Named Glücksburg (9741131924).jpg

With gear/flaps down, I like N914FJ, and N902FJ is really dynamic.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

No they’re not any better then the last, mainly the angle. how about this one N915FJ? The American eagle one. Oh again we cannot use defunct airlines, us airways is one. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 08:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC) OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 08:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Of course we can use defunct airlines, in fact it conveys a sense of an era.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

No you can’t? I did that for the 757 and if you look at the talk page it’ll tell you otherwise. Look I don’t want to ride doing all this. But the US airways images are bad because of the angling. The American eagle is a very good one. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You certainly can. This is an encyclopedia, there are no requirement for pictures to be of the latest and greatest. Personal preference for an airline livery is also not a good arguement for wanting to change an image. I see no issue with the current image, but given the above images, 914FJ or 921FJ do a good job of showing body style and undercarriage. Garretka (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

No requirements? So why is it that I get critisied for using a us airwyas 757 as the main image but get denied because the airliner is out of service? Yes, that makes all the sense. But again I disagree with you. Those pictures are bad. Why use an airliner that’s defunct? No point, it’s not like you’ll see the airliner nor a livery similar to it. I’m ending the discussion for the CRJ-700 as the photo was updated so I don’t even know why I’m still here, the image has been updated so that’s all good, I don’t think it should be changed anymore. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Well I don’t think it should be changed until something happens such as a new livery. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Article title
By analogy with Bombardier CRJ100/200, should this article be renamed to something like Bombardier CRJ700/900/1000, because it's not only about the 700? -- Beland (talk) 01:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * more explicit indeed --Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, but that is probably too many slashes for an article title. What about "Bombardier CRJ Series" the best candidate name or something else? -Fnlayson (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * A "Bombardier CRJ Series" would need to include the initial 100/200. A merge would perhaps be a good thing, but it should be a separate debate.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 12:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Bombardier CRJ already exists as a set index article. Now that production has basically ended, it might be time to consider a full merge. - BilCat (talk) 12:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Agreed - rather than renaming this article now, it seems to me that discussion of a full merge would be opportune. Rosbif73 (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Restart production
My sources at Leeham news confirm that the Mitsubishi will restart CRJ Series production, is it possible that if the mitsubishi restarted production Mitsubishi will be the new manufacturer of the CRJ Series? BeirutMa2021 (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

The Source:https://leehamnews.com/2021/07/06/exclusive-mitsubishi-ponders-restarting-crj-production/ BeirutMa2021 (talk) 21:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks but that article only says "Mitsubishi is considering restarting production". A more definite statement is needed before that should be added in the article, imo. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * If you're asking if we will move the article in put Mitsubishi in place of Bombardier in the title, the answer is probably not for many years, if ever. But we will add to the lead and infobox if production is actually restarted, so you don't have to worry about that. BilCat (talk) 03:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

OK but the restart production the new manufacturer is Mitsubishi? BeirutMa2021 (talk) 06:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, if it does happen. But the article title would not change anytime soon. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

But according to User BilCat:"If you're asking if we will move the article in put Mitsubishi in place of Bombardier in the title, the answer is probably not for many years, if ever. But we will add to the lead and infobox if production is actually restarted" BeirutMa2021 (talk) 15:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, Wikipedia has a common name policy. Because of that, this CRJ700 series will use the more common manufacturer name, which is Bombardier now. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

But in the future when restarting the production of the CRJ Series on Wikipedia will the name Mitsubishi CRJ change instead of the "Bombardier"? BeirutMa2021 (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That's already been answered here. Good day. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok Thank you Fnlayson. BeirutMa2021 (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

"Delta Air Lines Flight 4951" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Delta Air Lines Flight 4951. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Redirection
My sources in Wikipedia confirmed the article Bombardier CRJ redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ" and Bombardier CRJ700 series redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ700" (example:Bombardier crj1000 redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ1000") BeirutMa2021 (talk) 16:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * No, and please try to write in proper English.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirects already exist from Mitsubishi CRJ to Bombardier CRJ, and so on. It has already been explained multiple times that the articles will not be moved to the Mitsubishi name. So, what was the question? Rosbif73 (talk) 12:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)