Talk:Bombardier Challenger 600 series/Archive 1

Proposed merger
Bombardier CC-144 Challenger → Bombardier Challenger 600
 * (See Merging and moving pages for details on performing mergers.)

Rationale - Minimal content at this point, factual errors (most C_-144s were CL-600s and 601s). Already better covered on main page. - BilCat (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Support merge although only relevant info should be moved as some of it is incomplete, it says they are all 604s which is not true as per BilCat. MilborneOne (talk) 19:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Against merge since article has been updated and stands on its own now. It will probably end up being too big to be merged with C600.  My .02 :)  Tntdj (talk) 00:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There's still not been much improvement to the text, and much of it is based on a questionable source that uses a lot of speculation and opinion. There's a lot I can do to improve the articel, such as adding Infobox and footer templates, but that's just filler for the most part. Anyway, I'm not judging the article by the absence of those items anyway, as I have a good idea what it would look like with them. If you can concentrate on adding some sources that are more reliable, including detailing the several variants that the CF has used, and filling in some history, that would be good, and we'll see what it looks like in a week. - BilCat (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

loaded weight
Empty weight: 9,292 kg (20,485 lb) Loaded weight: 19,618 kg (43,250 lb) Useful load: 1,814 kg (4,000 lb) Max. takeoff weight: 19,550 kg (43,100 lb)

The loaded weight can not exceed the max. takeoff weight, if the loaded weight is correct I guess the max. weight will be between 20,500 - 23,000 kg

Greetings from Berlin :) Kilon22 (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Expose numeric variants in the TOC?
Should the table of contents be pushed down one more level so we can instantly skip down to say CL-605? Hcobb (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and removed the TOC limit as unnecessary, as most articles don't need it. Btw, thanks for moving the MSA info here. I was going to do it, but you beat me to it. - BilCat (talk) 01:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

MSA question
The refs I've seen imply that the MSA has much of the sensor gear of the P-8, but no weapons. Does anybody have a head to head comparison ref that goes into the details? Hcobb (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Main pic change
After going through 1,200 commons pics, here are the most useful for a main better pic.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 22:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

2019 Coahuila Crash
The Aviation Safety Network, which is used as a citation for this particular crash, lists the total number of fatalities in the crash as 13. The NTSB, however, gives a figure of either 14 or 16. The NTSB notes that they received this information from the DCAG, which has jurisdiction over the investigation, but there does not seem to be any reports about the accident currently on the DCAG website.

If possible, it would be helpful if someone perhaps more versed in Spanish than myself might be able to help resolve this discrepancy.--Waterfire (talk) 01:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)