Talk:Bombshell

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was Pages Moved  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Bombshell (disambiguation) → Bombshell — There is no one article that can claim ownership to bombshell. The terms refers to artillery, sexy ladies and shocking events.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Labattblueboy (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Bombshell → Bombshell (sex symbol)


 * Support — Per discussion on Talk:Bombshells. --Una Smith (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I would think that the shell of a bomb would be the primary... 70.29.211.163 (talk) 04:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support as it's a good idea for the dab page to sit there. 70.29.211.163 (talk) 04:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support, per the logic given; none of the three meanings possesses obvious primacy. 98.71.219.134 (talk) 05:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose The proposal makes perfect sense, but in my heart I wish that every matching name in the 'search' box would lead to an article and never to a disambiguation page. Either page can be "wrong", in the sense that it isn't the page you were looking for, but a disambiguation page is always the "wrong" page, while an article page is sometimes the "right" page.


 * Reading the lead (and sometimes more) of a "wrong" article before continuing on to a disambiguation page to seek the "right" article, I sometimes learn something new or interesting without being distracted from my original purpose, which isn't possible with a disambiguation page without following a link to an obviously "wrong" article and back again. I'd hate for logical choices to completely eliminate serendipity from Wikipedia.


 * Specifically, I support moving Bombshell → Bombshell (sex symbol), but oppose moving Bombshell (disambiguation) → Bombshell. I'd rather redirect Bombshell → any article you like. I'd even support changing the target from time to time, as the spirit moved you, unless that somehow offends some WP policy. Just please don't send it to a disambiguation page - life becomes unnecessarily drab if all decisions are strictly logical. Yappy2bhere (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Bombshells still redirects to Bombshells (M*A*S*H). Perhaps it should follow Bombshell, wherever it roams. Yappy2bhere (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Bombshell (comics) is also a disambiguation page
This disambiguation page links to another disambiguation page, Bombshell (comics). Is that useful somehow, or was it an accident? Yappy2bhere (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Having two disambigs. is not likely intentional. I have redirected the comics disambig here. The links are already on the page so it's just duplication. --Labattblueboy (talk) 17:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The merge was reverted so I have put Bombshell (comics) up for deletion as it has few incoming links and merging the content into this disambig. that way. --Labattblueboy (talk) 05:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)