Talk:Bombuzal

Fair use rationale for Image:Bombuzal.gif
Image:Bombuzal.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

"Amiga 2600"
I'm a long time fan of the Amiga computer series (I got my first Amiga in 1990), and I'm almost certain that there is no such thing as an "Amiga 2600".

The reference in the source material is probably a mistype of "Atari 2600".

There are no photos of an "Amiga 2600", or a logo, or any reputable references on the web. I think we should alter the term in the article to "Atari 2600" (which is almost certainly what it's meant to be), or remove it. InternetMeme (talk) 08:57, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Here is a list of Amiga models from Lemon Amiga, probably one of the best sources for Amiga info:
 * Amiga Models - Amiga computer models information - Lemon Amiga InternetMeme (talk) 09:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The review initially claims to have been for the "Amiga 2600 version", which is what I was going by. The name Amiga is mentioned again later in the review whie the name Atari is not; therefore, if there was no Amiga 2600, then I'd say the safest bet would be to remove the "2600" rather than switching it from Amiga to Atari. Makes sense? BOZ (talk) 12:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Brilliant, let's go with that : ) InternetMeme (talk) 19:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Contents of Brainblaster Compilation
Content is listed on hol.abime.net/5423 as Xenon 2 and Bombuzal. A quick search on Ebay also yield these 2 games as content of the compilation, so the former entry Xevious 2 was a mistake. --Koren (talk) 00:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)