Talk:Bondiola sandwich/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 00:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

I plan to review this tonight.  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 00:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * All done! Note this is my first food-related review, so apologies in advance for any obvious errors. On a side note, I am now incredibly hungry… Anyways, I have placed this article on hold for now and left some comments below. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns, otherwise I may not respond. Thanks,  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 01:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Nice work! I am now pleased to pass this article for GA status. Congrats!  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 17:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyvio check
Earwig says good to go.

Files
All images used are relevant, of good quality and copyright-free:
 * : CC-BY-SA 2.0;
 * : CC-BY-SA 2.0.

Prose

 * ✅In the infobox, capitalise lemon juice.
 * ✅I would perhaps wikilink sandwich in this context as it seems relevant to the overall article.
 * Is "History" the right name for the section? I am so used to writing articles in this way but I can change it. Bruxton (talk) 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, the text does not appear to actually be related to history. Unfortunately as I am unfamiliar with articles related to cuisine I am not entirely sure what to call it. Any ideas?
 * I see that Grilled cheese, uses history, Submarine sandwich uses History and etymology, Cheesesteak uses history. Many sandwich articles are stubs so they have no sections.Bruxton (talk) 16:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see! My bad then.


 * ✅Should Choripán and Parrilla be capitalised?
 * ✅Recommend combining the sentence starting "It now rivals the Choripán" with the sentence about its commonness in Buenos Aires restaurants as they seem closely related, and the former sentence feels out of place where it is right now.
 * ✅Wikilink brioche in Description.
 * ✅"it is called (Bondiola di Treviso)." – no need for the parentheses here.
 * ✅I am sure you have researched extensively, but as the article is on the shorter I do have to ask: is there anything else in RS sources that could perhaps be added? I was pretty thorough but I will see if I missed anything. Bruxton (talk) 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Refs
Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 3, 4, 6 or 7.


 * ✅Remove Ph.D. from ref 1; post-nominals are not included in citations.
 * ✅Are publication dates available for refs 4–5 and 7–9?
 * ✅ Ref 6 appears to have the wrong publication name; I believe it should be La Nacion.
 * ✅Ref 8 looks unreliable as a blog. removed

Other
Short desc, See also, navbox and cats look good.


 * ✅Recommend adding template:use dmy dates.
 * ✅Recommend adding template:use X English.
 * ✅The YouTube URL seems unnecessary. removed and moved the commons to last section per MOS:ORDER Bruxton (talk) 02:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I have made the changes. Thanks for a speedy review. Bruxton (talk) 02:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Lucky for you Agriculture, food and drink is the highest GA category alphabetically :)  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 03:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)